Blog

When a robot says 0 she really means 1

No matter how many times I see it, I always get something new out of watching Blade Runner. I’d seen the Theatrical Release only a few weeks ago and just caught a midnight showing of The Final Cut. I thought it would be a bit much, but that wasn’t the case at all. Here are a few new things I noticed after the latest viewing:

The constant downpour in Los Angeles and the proliferation of bicycles and chintzy electric cars always presented a flawed future, but it is more relevant now to fears of climate change. Together with artificial animals replacing those brought to extinction, it shows humanity trying too little too late to correct the damage it’s done. I’m both amazed and saddened that this is still a significant theme over 25 years later.

In Deckard’s fight against Roy, both of their hands are damaged: Roy has broken Deckard’s fingers and Roy has pushed a nail through his own palm. It would seem Roy and Deckard have something in common.

Pris slips running from J.F. Sebastian and smashes her arm through the plate glass window of his van; Deckard hits Roy with a pipe and sends him crashing his arm through a window; when Zhora is shot she also crashes through a store window. Maybe the sound and visual of glass breaking are just cool.

Seeing Zhora running from Deckard I felt a much deeper sadness for her because she only wanted to live. She was running for her life.

Doll RachaelI recognized this before, but only on a subconscious level, that with her stylized sleek black hair, muted gray suit and bright, artificially red lipstick, Rachael is supposed to look like a doll.

The scene after Deckard ‘airs out’ Zhora, when he’s talking to Gaff after ordering a bottle of liquor, Rachael is standing obscured in the background behind him. She’s seen more clearly later on, when Deckard notices her, but I hadn’t noticed she was lurking this whole time, following him. Talk about needy GFs.

Rachael lurks

It’s already a contested issue over whether or not Deckard is a replicant. Ridley Scott says he is, Harrison Ford says he isn’t (a replicant would say that). I thought I had it sorted out just by the sheer implausibility of creating a Deckard replicant, plopping him down in 2019 Los Angeles, putting him up in a dingy apartment, and letting him go about his day until the police department needs him to run down any blades.

It all seemed like such a hassle, especially since the replicants had no illusions about who they were — why go through the trouble with Deckard? The movie addresses the reason for this directly: “If we gift them with a past, we create a cushion or a pillow for their emotions, and consequently, we can control them better.” Memories! He’s talking about memories!

But this didn’t clinch it for me. What did was that earlier in the story, Rachael shows Deckard a photograph of her as a child with her mother. In the scene where Deckard has his unicorn vision, we see that Deckard already had a framed photo of the same scene on his piano.

Enhance 34 to 46

But whether Deckard’s a replicant or not isn’t important. To Philip K. Dick, it was the ambiguity over it, the uncertainty. For me, as well as to many of the characters, what mattered was we are all living beings, and we are all condemned to die. We don’t know when, but we know it will happen. Does it matter whether we’re human or replicant?

And finally on the topic of what makes us human, I always felt a little uneasy about the romantic scene between Deckard and Rachael where he pretty much coerces Rachel into physical intimacy. Then I thought of Deckard’s story from before:

Remember when you were six? You and your brother snuck into an empty building through a basement window. You were going to play doctor. He showed you his but when it got to be your turn you chickened and ran, you remember that?

And just when she and Deckard were starting to become close, what did Rachael do? She chickened and ran, just like she did in her memories.

“If we gift them with a past, we create a cushion or a pillow for their emotions, and consequently, we can control them better.”

Deckard’s actions did seem oddly forceful until I realized what he was doing. He was breaking her programming.

After the final fight with Roy, Deckard returns to find a more humanized Rachael. Gone is the bright red lipstick, the curious hairstyle, the stifling robotic grey suit, Rachael is now more woman than womachine.

Very Thoughtful!  B+

Video

*UNAIRED* 1985 Watchmen toy ad

This is a commercial for the Adrian Veidt action figure that was never aired, due to cancellation of the toy line. Found this on an old VHS. Did they ever make any of these??

Here’s my entry for the YouTube Watchmen ad contest. The best ones will get put somewhere in the background of the upcoming Watchmen movie, which is pretty exciting. Hope you like it — the winners are determined by the most number of views / highest rating, so watch early, and watch often!

Uncategorized

I don’t think I am going to date for awhile.

This just isn’t worth it anymore.

Work

I don’t care, I like PHP

I’m a PHP developer, and I am going to out myself as a naïve n00b by saying I’ve never had a problem with writing applications for it. Yes, I may even enjoy programming in PHP. This is why I’m linking to an article Jeff at Coding Horror wrote on why PHP Sucks, But It Doesn’t Matter.

The TIOBE community index I linked above? It’s written in PHP. Wikipedia, which is likely to be on the first page of anything you search for these days? Written in PHP. Digg, the social bookmarking service so wildly popular that a front page link can crush the beefiest of webservers? Written in PHP. WordPress, arguably the most popular blogging solution available at the moment? Written in PHP. YouTube, the most widely known video sharing site on the internet? Written in PHP. Facebook, the current billion-dollar zombie-poking social networking darling of venture capitalists everywhere? Written in PHP.

Notice a pattern here?

Architecture astronauts may have a problem with the language, but the fact is PHP is getting the job done. Now Javascript on the other hand — scattered documentation, poor debugging support, the OO-over designing pitfalls. I don’t see how anyone can get anything done with it. Some people can, but not me.

I, um, blame the tools.

Uncategorized

This is an area I am unfamiliar with

Despite having a Tivo, I still manage to see more than my fair share of cheap, sleazy infomercials on late night TV. I thought all of them were either Girls Gone Wild ads or those selling fake pills coyly suggesting they make “that certain part of the male anatomy” bigger. (That would be the scrotum, of course.)

That was until I caught an infomercial on Oxygen I hadn’t seen before. A cheap, sleazy infomercial for women.

I know women can feel left out when guys talk, like when my friends and I tried to explain The Legend of Zelda to one of our girl friends: the game was notable because it came in a gold cart; in it you play a boy named Link (because Zelda is the princess), who must fight the pig-monster Ganon to rescue her and the Triforce. Makes sense so far, right?

She was completely lost in our nerd jargon, which was further exacerbated by our discussion of how the mutant hooker in Total Recall (guess which one? [NSFW]) was the pinnacle of evolution.

Utterly baffled — that’s how I felt watching this Oxygen infomercial and hearing the phrase:

pink bent graduate impulse silver bullet jackrabbit

To me that’s just a string of words, but I’m amazed there’s a large percentage of women out there who know exactly what this describes. Utterly baffling.

Also, I need to get out more.

Uncategorized

I made an Ozmandias action figure

This isn’t the nerdiest thing I’ve done, but it’s definitely in the top ten…

Ozmandias action figure

I’ll let you know how the commercial shoot turns out.

Uncategorized

Veidt Enterprises is looking for ads

I may be the last to learn about it, but Veidt Enterprises is looking for commercials for its new ad campaign due out in first quarter 2009. Deadline is June 2! This isn’t mine, but here’s an example of what they’re looking for:

It may be for a completely fictitious company, but at least it’s better than hawking ketchup. Hawking Ketchup — the smartest ketchup in the known universe!

Uncategorized

I will choose a new song chart!

Just making new nerdy song charts gives me such a Rush…

Free Will

Uncategorized

I learned a new word today!

Urban Dictionary defines ladette as:

Popular British term to decribe a girl who, in answer to the male “lad culture” of the 1990’s, bizarrely adopted the exact same behaviour as the men they claimed to be reacting against – mainly drinking pints of lager, swearing and vomiting publicly, and watching football, all conducted with exaggerated zeal. Interestingly, the behaviour of the ladette played into the hands of the lad…

Looks like The Daily Mail has this one pretty well covered. Keep it classy, ladettes and chavs!

Blog

Pepsi Stuff doesn’t add up

1 point.

I signed away my personal information to pepsistuff.amazon.com for one lousy point, and at one point per 2-liter of soda, that just doesn’t cut it. This calls to mind another MP3 promotion, 7-11’s iTunes promotion from 2004 where a $1.29 Slurpee bought you one 99¢ song from the iTunes store. To do the cheapskate math, that’s an iTunes song and a 29¢ Slurpee, which is why I drank so many of them I got sick of Slurpees. For now.

Contrast with Pepsi Stuff: to get the same reward, you need five points for one song. That means buying $5 to $7 worth of soda — 10 liters — just to get one 89¢ MP3.

It’s a good thing I buy a lot of soda.

EDIT: I can’t believe the pap I’m blogging about.

Next Page »