<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Yahoo &#8216;News&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timtoon.com/2007/10/19/more-yahoo-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timtoon.com/2007/10/19/more-yahoo-news/</link>
	<description>Lookout honey, 'cuz I'm using technology.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: This deal is getting worse all the time at TIMtheTOON</title>
		<link>http://www.timtoon.com/2007/10/19/more-yahoo-news/#comment-3654</link>
		<dc:creator>This deal is getting worse all the time at TIMtheTOON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 22:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timtoon.com/2007/10/19/more-yahoo-news/#comment-3654</guid>
		<description>[...] Oh, and Black Friday is a stupid name. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oh, and Black Friday is a stupid name. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.timtoon.com/2007/10/19/more-yahoo-news/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 06:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timtoon.com/2007/10/19/more-yahoo-news/#comment-404</guid>
		<description>Yes, that's why I was drawing attention to it up front.  Here I'm making an effort to not simply repeat other peoples' news with my 2 cents thrown in.  I would rather create original content than simply link to it.

Now creating &lt;i&gt;good&lt;/i&gt; content may be another story...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that&#8217;s why I was drawing attention to it up front.  Here I&#8217;m making an effort to not simply repeat other peoples&#8217; news with my 2 cents thrown in.  I would rather create original content than simply link to it.</p>
<p>Now creating <i>good</i> content may be another story&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThePete</title>
		<link>http://www.timtoon.com/2007/10/19/more-yahoo-news/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>ThePete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timtoon.com/2007/10/19/more-yahoo-news/#comment-403</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but by complaining about those other blogs you're kind of doing what they do, aren't you?

Kind of like a movie critic critic.

Personally, I think there's room for and importance to all of our opinions--however, I also think we can pick and choose which opinions we should give a shit about--that's why I generally don't read movie reviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but by complaining about those other blogs you&#8217;re kind of doing what they do, aren&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>Kind of like a movie critic critic.</p>
<p>Personally, I think there&#8217;s room for and importance to all of our opinions&#8211;however, I also think we can pick and choose which opinions we should give a shit about&#8211;that&#8217;s why I generally don&#8217;t read movie reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.timtoon.com/2007/10/19/more-yahoo-news/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 04:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timtoon.com/2007/10/19/more-yahoo-news/#comment-395</guid>
		<description>I think navel-gazing had something to do with Plato's cave.

Anyway, it's not my blog I loathe, it's those that coast on merely commenting on other peoples' content.  When there's a news story, how exactly does the reaction of some self-important douchebag with a blogger.com account contribute to the significance of the original article?  It doesn't.

It's like the relationship between an artist and his critics -- only one needs the other to exist.  I prefer not to rely on other people to make news, I prefer to have a site that stands on its own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think navel-gazing had something to do with Plato&#8217;s cave.</p>
<p>Anyway, it&#8217;s not my blog I loathe, it&#8217;s those that coast on merely commenting on other peoples&#8217; content.  When there&#8217;s a news story, how exactly does the reaction of some self-important douchebag with a blogger.com account contribute to the significance of the original article?  It doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like the relationship between an artist and his critics &#8212; only one needs the other to exist.  I prefer not to rely on other people to make news, I prefer to have a site that stands on its own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThePete</title>
		<link>http://www.timtoon.com/2007/10/19/more-yahoo-news/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>ThePete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 02:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timtoon.com/2007/10/19/more-yahoo-news/#comment-394</guid>
		<description>"And the new biography describing creator Charles Schulz as â€œa man who could neither forget nor forgive any slight or lonely momentâ€ comes as anything but news to anyone with even a passing familiarity with his interminable, unfunny strip."

I had no thought as to how depressed a man Schulz was.  Based on his comic strip, I just assumed he was a boring old white guy.

And I agree with you on the financial stuff--it sure seems like smoke and mirrors to me.  

Oh and I think you're getting Nas confused with that other rapper, Sir Shames-A-Lot.  Wait, I think that's ALL rappers.  It's so hard to tell them apart!  It's like they're all black or something! &#62;_O

Also: where the hell did the phrase "navel gazing" come from and, truly, what does it mean?  It's some lame-ass Greek myth, right?  Some digital avatar stares at his navel so long he falls in and has to reverse the computer's access code to get out.  Right?

I feel awkward even admitting I have a navel--I can't imagine how anyone would want to stare at theirs.

That said, I think you're part of an emerging genre of self-loathing blogs that bag on other blogs for being, well, blogs.  Like those folks that say "real" journalism is dying because of bloggers not having credentials.  Like the credentials the folks at Fox News or the Washington Times have guaranteed quality journalism in the build up to the Iraq War (or the NYTimes or CNN or anyone else, really).

The other thing I think that is important to note is that the majority of *any* type of media/genre sucks.  This is because the majority of humans suck at what they do.  But I don't think all of TV should be destroyed because of that--I just watch very little TV.  Problem solved.  The same goes for websites.  Just hit the ones you like and skip the ones that you think are lame.  This is why you'll hardly ever see me post on a forum.  There is one that I visit for writers and that's it.  Forums are the taint of the Internet.

Just my 2 yen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And the new biography describing creator Charles Schulz as â€œa man who could neither forget nor forgive any slight or lonely momentâ€ comes as anything but news to anyone with even a passing familiarity with his interminable, unfunny strip.&#8221;</p>
<p>I had no thought as to how depressed a man Schulz was.  Based on his comic strip, I just assumed he was a boring old white guy.</p>
<p>And I agree with you on the financial stuff&#8211;it sure seems like smoke and mirrors to me.  </p>
<p>Oh and I think you&#8217;re getting Nas confused with that other rapper, Sir Shames-A-Lot.  Wait, I think that&#8217;s ALL rappers.  It&#8217;s so hard to tell them apart!  It&#8217;s like they&#8217;re all black or something! &gt;_O</p>
<p>Also: where the hell did the phrase &#8220;navel gazing&#8221; come from and, truly, what does it mean?  It&#8217;s some lame-ass Greek myth, right?  Some digital avatar stares at his navel so long he falls in and has to reverse the computer&#8217;s access code to get out.  Right?</p>
<p>I feel awkward even admitting I have a navel&#8211;I can&#8217;t imagine how anyone would want to stare at theirs.</p>
<p>That said, I think you&#8217;re part of an emerging genre of self-loathing blogs that bag on other blogs for being, well, blogs.  Like those folks that say &#8220;real&#8221; journalism is dying because of bloggers not having credentials.  Like the credentials the folks at Fox News or the Washington Times have guaranteed quality journalism in the build up to the Iraq War (or the NYTimes or CNN or anyone else, really).</p>
<p>The other thing I think that is important to note is that the majority of *any* type of media/genre sucks.  This is because the majority of humans suck at what they do.  But I don&#8217;t think all of TV should be destroyed because of that&#8211;I just watch very little TV.  Problem solved.  The same goes for websites.  Just hit the ones you like and skip the ones that you think are lame.  This is why you&#8217;ll hardly ever see me post on a forum.  There is one that I visit for writers and that&#8217;s it.  Forums are the taint of the Internet.</p>
<p>Just my 2 yen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
