<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Internet: Let&#8217;s call the whole thing off</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timtoon.com/2007/04/15/the-internet-lets-call-the-whole-thing-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timtoon.com/2007/04/15/the-internet-lets-call-the-whole-thing-off/</link>
	<description>Lookout honey, 'cuz I'm using technology.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.timtoon.com/2007/04/15/the-internet-lets-call-the-whole-thing-off/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 18:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timtoon.com/2007/04/15/the-internet-lets-call-the-whole-thing-off/#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Yes, that is a lot of devices.  In fact, that's 52 billion billion billion devices for every man, woman and child on earth.  While IPv6 is forward-looking, I can't conceive of the combined effort of the entire human race even coming close to using that many IPs.  (Maybe the current IP system could be modified to accept values from 0-F, rather than 0-9.  That would open up a few more addresses!)

While the potential use of IPv6 is sound, it's all the other invasive security measures of the new systems that bother me.  Too much is lost for too little gain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that is a lot of devices.  In fact, that&#8217;s 52 billion billion billion devices for every man, woman and child on earth.  While IPv6 is forward-looking, I can&#8217;t conceive of the combined effort of the entire human race even coming close to using that many IPs.  (Maybe the current IP system could be modified to accept values from 0-F, rather than 0-9.  That would open up a few more addresses!)</p>
<p>While the potential use of IPv6 is sound, it&#8217;s all the other invasive security measures of the new systems that bother me.  Too much is lost for too little gain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Coward</title>
		<link>http://www.timtoon.com/2007/04/15/the-internet-lets-call-the-whole-thing-off/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 17:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timtoon.com/2007/04/15/the-internet-lets-call-the-whole-thing-off/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>999,999,999,999 I.P. addresses? What about IPv6? 2 to the power of 128 (2^128) addresses = about 340 billion billion billion billion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>999,999,999,999 I.P. addresses? What about IPv6? 2 to the power of 128 (2^128) addresses = about 340 billion billion billion billion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myles</title>
		<link>http://www.timtoon.com/2007/04/15/the-internet-lets-call-the-whole-thing-off/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Myles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 05:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timtoon.com/2007/04/15/the-internet-lets-call-the-whole-thing-off/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>I am so sorry I followed that last link. -M.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so sorry I followed that last link. -M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
